FDA 510(k) Third Party Review Program Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Third Party Review Organizations

标准简介

510(k) Third Party Review Program Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Third Party Review Organizations[附网盘链接]是Food&Drug Administration于当前发布的FDA标准,适用于United States。

标准截图

510(k) Third Party Review Program  Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Third Party Review Organizations[附网盘链接]
510(k) Third Party Review Program Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Third Party Review Organizations[附网盘链接](截图)

 

标准文档说明

标准文档类型为510(k) Third Party Review Program Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Third Party Review Organizations[附网盘链接]高清PDF版本(文字版),标准文档内可进行搜索,可以复制原文,可粘贴。

标准部分原文

510(k) Third Party Review Program Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Third Party Review Organizations This guidance represents the current thinking of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. To discuss an alternative approach, contact the FDA staff or Office responsible for this guidance as listed on the title page. I. Introduction The 510(k) Third Party (3P510k) Review Program (formally known as the Accredited Persons (AP) Program) is authorized under section 523 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) 1

Act. Under this authority, FDA recognizes third parties to review premarket notification (510(k)) submissions and recommend the initial classification of certain devices. FDA’s implementation of section 523 establishes a process for recognition of qualified third parties to conduct the initial review of 510(k) submissions for certain low-to-moderate risk devices eligible for review under the 3P510k Review Program within the Center for Devices and Radiological 2

Health (CDRH). This guidance document also reflects amendments made to section 523 by the 3 4

FDA Reauthorization Act of 2017 (FDARA), which directed FDA to issue guidance on the factors that will be used in determining whether a class I or class II device type, or subset of such device types, is eligible for review by an accredited person. For the current edition of the FDA-recognized standards referenced in this document, see the 5

FDA Recognized Consensus Standards Database. For more information regarding use of 1

Section 523 of the FD&C Act uses the terms “accredited persons,” “accredit,” “accredited,” “accreditation,” “reaccredit,” “reaccredited,” and “reaccreditation.” The guidance does not use those statutory terms but rather defines such terms as “recognition,” and “rerecognition” as synonymous terms. These alternative terms are used in this guidance to harmonize the terms used by FDA and in the FD&C Act with those in the International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) documents and are defined in Section IV of this guidance. 2

Currently, the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research does not regulate devices of the types subject to this guidance. 3

Pub. L. 115-52 4

See section 523(a)(3)(B) of the FD&C Act. 5

Available at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfStandards/search.cfm.

网盘链接

百度网盘:https://pan.baidu.com/s/1MA5zY9BsntjGiU_989pWzA
提取码:r2nt

【温馨提示】大资料ISO是提供信息发布的专业信息类网站,所有内容均由用户发布,不代表本站观点,本站亦不存储所涉及的文件及资料。如有【免费资料】以及【付费资料】,请用户根据自己的需求,自行判断是否需要获取。如有交易诈骗、内容侵权可发送邮件至kf@dzl100.com,我们审查后若发现情况属实,会立即对相关内容进行删除处理。

加载用时:29.6019 毫秒

相关评论

相关文章